Daar werkte hij onder meer aan plannen voor de bestrijding van een mogelijke ebola-pandemie. On March 6, 2021, a Belgian veterinarian named Geert Vanden Bossche published an open letter"to all authorities, scientists and experts around the world" asserting that, in his expert analysis, the current global COVID-19 vaccination program will "wipe out large parts of our human population." Therefore he has zero credibility when it comes to advising the public or anyone else about how to avoid negative effects of mass vaccination. 39. "It isn't," he told us. Dat punt maakte ook Otto Yang, professor Infectieziekten aan de Universiteit van California, in de krant USA Today. Geert Vanden Bossche is een Belgische dierenarts, viroloog, zelfverklaard mRNA-vaccinatie specialist en onafhankelijk onderzoeker en adviseur op het gebied van vaccins. Geert Vanden Bossche is a scientist who published an open letter warning of global catastrophe due to deadly variants of COVID-19 selected for by mass vaccination. Geert Vanden Bossche Contribute to IMDb. As I like to say, if you ever write anything that channels Andrew Wakefield, you really should reconsider your life choices. Specifically, scientists have long been pointing out that, the more we let COVID-19 circulate, the more likely virus variants that can escape the immune response to the vaccine (and/or to natural infection) are to emerge, and they use this argument as a rationale for vaccinating as many people as possible as fast as possible, in order to slow that circulation of the virus to as low a rate as possible, thus reducing the opportunities for strains resistant to the vaccine and strains able to re-infect previously infected people to emerge. The solution to that risk is to vaccinate as many people as quickly as possible, thereby reducing both transmission of the virus and the number of environments in which mutations could occur. Reading the letter, what it reminded me, more than anything else, is an article that Andrew Wakefield wrote about the MMR vaccine and measles, published a few months before the pandemic hit. But only ongoing clinical trials will show whether vaccinated individuals recognise SARS-CoV-2 variants differently, and whether mutations decrease vaccine protection in some vaccinated individuals. Sounds familiar: suboptimal immune pressure + viral variant! Why? De experten zitten op twitter fact-checkers te liken en roepen mij op aan de juiste kant te staan. Unfortunately, it remains untouched by those who have the power to act. He does apparently have some history working on vaccines. Het onderzoek ernaar is nog zeer pril. Global Alliance for Vaccines and Immunization, Colloidal aspects of enteroviral infectivity in aqueous environments with special emphasis on poliovirus type 1, Factcheck: dierenarts verspreidt onjuistheden over het immuunsysteem en de coronavaccins, The Doomsday Prophecy of Dr. Geert Vanden Bossche, https://nl.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Geert_Vanden_Bossche&oldid=63871838. Please read and share: https://t.co/0Fupw9JInP #COVID19 pic.twitter.com/I24mSjpVKM, Geert Vanden Bossche (@GVDBossche) March 6, 2021. As we explain below, this scenario is speculative, scientifically flawed, logically inconsistent, and belied by actual data. However, Dr. Vincent Iannelli asked the question, Who is Geert Vanden Bossche? too and isunimpressed. If you claim to be not antivaccine but your message is so attractive to a rabid antivaxxer and leader of the antivaccine movement like Del Bigtree that he spends an hour promoting it, you are either deluding yourself about being not antivaccine, or youre a useful idiot for the antivaccine movement, possibly both. VRT en Knack, kijk eens in de spiegel en laat ons toe de interviews die ik met jullie had publiek te maken. That. On the contrary, I can assure you that each of the current vaccines have been designed, developed and manufactured by brilliant and competent scientists. Dan vraag ik me af waar we mee bezig zijn. While there is no doubt that current vaccines will become less effective over time due to genetic drift, this is not something that vaccine science is unaware of or unprepared for. One can easily extrapolate this scourge to resistance to our self-made antiviral antibiotics. Dit toont nogmaals de nood van open debat aan. However, even if this phenomenon occurs with a human vaccineit doesnt, as far as we knowthats an even more compelling reason to be vaccinated. Exactly. Ik heb een lijst van professoren die mijn bezorgdheden delen en zal deze publiceren. Hij waarschuwt met name voor de risico's van het vaccineren van kinderen met mRNA-vaccins. There is, indeed, compelling scientific evidence that these cells play a key role in facilitating complete elimination of Covid-19 at an early stage of infection in asymptomatically infected subjects. Integendeel, zegt vaccinoloog Corinne Vandermeulen (KU Leuven), en ze somt de epidemien op die in het verleden net onder controle gebracht zijn door te vaccineren: Cholera, ebola, polio. You can read the links if you want to know more, but the short version is that the acellular pertussis vaccine works but its immunity wanes (as it does after natural infection); this can be corrected with additional booster shots. Even more hilariously (and a bit uncomfortably) Frei is pretty spot on when she notes: However, this is on very shaky ground. Archeologen tonen verborgen gang die ze ontdekten in 4.500 jaar oude piramide van Cheops in Egypte, Het kraakpaleis werd ontruimd, terwijl het een mogelijk alternatief biedt, Open brief: Boos op onze politieke leiders. Now, lets compare the passage above to what Andrew Wakefield wrote about MMR and vaccines: Antibiotic use has selected out multiply resistant, more dangerous, and more pathogenic strains of bacteria. In any case, for someone who is so not antivaccine, Dr. Vanden Bossche sure is good at providing ammunition to the antivaccine movement. But, he said, Vanden Bossche's arguments "take a little bit of truth and then add a whole lot of misrepresentation.". We can hardly say we didnt know or were not warned. The current monkeypox outbreak is a result of the Covid vaccinations that are connected to Covid reinfections and the related reactivation of cytotoxic t-cells, claims Dr. Vanden Bossche. Update information for Geert Vanden Bossche More at IMDbPro Contact Info: View agent, publicist, legal on IMDbPro Biography Awards Photo Gallery Filmography (by Job) Trailers and Videos Explore More Known For Compleetdenkers Self 2022 Hes also conflating innate immune responses with specific immune responses induced by either infection or vaccination. Vanden Bossche has created a scientific-sounding argument that vaccination will encourage the production of COVID-19 variants that our immune systems will be unprepared to fight. Vanden Bossche neemt geen woord terug van zijn stellingen. Antibiotica werken rechtstreeks in op de bacterie. Bent u getuige van een nieuwsfeit of hebt u zelf nieuws te melden? Bij de vorming van de Verenigde Nederlandse Staten in 1789 vormden zij de eerder conservatieve fractie tegenover de vonckisten. This is an absurdly counterproductive solution if Vanden Bossche were truly concerned about variants. p.381-386. We hebben Geert Vanden Bossche gevraagd om te reageren, maar hij verkoos dat niet te doen. Snoeck noemt het onomwonden technische nonsens die voor een niet-wetenschapper moeilijk te doorprikken zijn. If we, human beings, are committed to perpetuating our species, we have no choice lef [sic] but to eradicate these highly infectious viral variants. Maar een virus zou een hele resem mutaties moeten doormaken om het afweersysteem van ons lichaam te omzeilen. Noting how quickly Dr. Vanden Bossches letter was embraced by antivaxxers, Frei then writes: But from my experience as a former long-time medical writer and journalist (1988-2016) particularly a four-month stint with media-relations giant FleishmanHillard in 1994 (yes, Ive worked for the dark side) this has all the hallmarks of a drug-company astroturf campaign. Even so, concern about immune escape is one reason why Pfizer, BioNTech, and Moderna used the entire SARS-CoV-2 spike protein, rather than specific segments of it that might serve as antigens, so that the polyclonal antibody immune response generated would be broad and unlikely to be escaped with single mutationsor even multiple mutations. Snoeck vergelijkt NK-cellen met een ongeleid projectiel: Elke cel die er niet normaal uitziet, wordt gedood. (6/7) When presenting with first signs & symptoms, ALL MUST have free access to immune-strengthening supplements (mostly sufficient for the young & previously healthy) and early multidrug treatment (mostly required for the vulnerable & elderly). Theres abundant evidence that Vanden Bossche has a not-so-hidden agenda. Failure to comply with these requirements is at risk of granting microbes a chance to survive and hence, may cause the disease to fare [sic] up. This particular coronavirus happens to have a proofreading mechanism that results in a low mutation rate compared to that of a lot of other RNA viruses, such as, for example, the influenza virus. Its hard for me not to believe that hes grifting, and this demonization of existing COVID-19 vaccines based on speculative science and no strong data yet is a sales pitch. Vaccinologists, scientists and clinicians are blinded by the positive short-term effects in individual patents, but dont seem to bother about the disastrous consequences for global health. Des te meer in ons land aangezien hij een Belg is. There is a sound scientific rationale to assume that it is possible to prime NK cells in ways for them to recognize and kill Coronaviruses at large (include all their variants) at an early stage of infection. So, as we grow up, we increasingly mount pathogen-specific immunity, including highly specific Abs. His LinkedIn profile lists several impressive positions, including Head of the Vaccine Development Office for the German Centre for Infection Research (for seven months, August 2017-February 2018); Chief Innovation & Scientific Officer for Univac, where he claimed to be an inventor of a new vaccine technology based on natural killer (NK) cells (2014-2016); and the managing director of VARECO, claiming to be a consultant about vaccine development (2012-present). Er hatte sich am 6. Vanden Bossche had drie jaar lang een start-up die een NK-vaccin wilde ontwikkelen. As a scientist I do not usually appeal to any platform of this kind to make a stand on vaccine-related topics. This will, indeed, require large vaccination campaigns. Partijvoorzitters De Wever en Mahdi willen landen (maar pinnen zich ook niet vast op Amerikaanse president Joe Biden succesvol behandeld voor huidkanker, Gepensioneerde gevangenisdirecteur zit nu zelf in de cel, nadat cannabisplantage bij hem is gevonden. Het publiekelijk schofferen van wetenshappers of mensen die hun job kwijt raken of beledigd worden omdat ze zich kritisch uitspreken, zulke zaken passen niet in onze cultuur van vrije meningsuiting en open debat. He adds hes now focusing on vaccines that educate the immune system in ways that are to some extent more efficient than we do right now with our conventional vaccines. Clearly hes got significant conflicts of interest. By the time I get through this, I suspect youll understand why the misinformation that Dr. Vanden Bossche is selling (and I use the word selling intentionally, as I suspect theres grift involved) is nonsense and nothing more than repackaged antivax tropes. Het magazine Knack ontdekte bovendien dat Vanden Bossche zijn artikels publiceerde in tijdschriften die publicaties aanbieden tegen betaling, dat bij sommige publicaties een functie bij de Universiteit Gent vermeld wordt die niet bestaat, en dat hij nepconferenties bijwoonde.
Beautiful Woman With Borderline Personality Disorder,
Articles G