benefits of using holland and rees critiquing framework

3 0 obj Critical care nurses pain assessment and management practices: A survey in Canada. Subject selection was conducted with maximum variation in personal factors (age, education level, duration of work experience, and organizational role). According to Holloway and Wheeler (2010) maximum variation can include both genders, young and old and of different nationalities, article A included both men and women of different ages. [Accessed 29 April 2019]. << This essay should not be treated as an authoritative source of information when forming medical opinions as information may be inaccurate or out-of-date. Questions Appendix 1 and Data Extraction Table Appendix 2. (2008) stated that inadequacy of training courses for pain measurement was one of the significant barriers to the use of non-verbal pain assessment scales. Article A used a purposeful sampling method to select participants, this continued until data saturation. Almost all patients had district nurse visits and they expressed frustration that the According to LoBiondo-Wood and Haber (2014) surveys have their advantages and disadvantages. /Rotate 0 The participants do however, state there are barriers which can prevent them from carrying out the assessments. 18 0 obj Article B showed limitations, one of the questions within the survey assessed the pain assessment tools used by the participant. An IRB can approve the proposed plans, require modifications or disapprove them (Polit and Beck, 2018). According to Holloway and Wheeler (2010) maximum variation can include both genders, young and old and of different nationalities, article A included both men and women of different ages. /Parent 2 0 R The full citation precedes this introduction. Linking Evidence to Action. Oxford: Oxford University Press. /Type /Page The CASP is to help a reader develops critical skills so as to be sensitive of scientific research and, therefore, to think reasonably about any research encountered (Public Health Resource Unit, 2007). >> The children also had to live with the shock of a parent living with an open surgical wound. /Resources 16 0 R Most of the patients expressed fear and anxiety when they saw the wound. Glendinning, C. (2016) Long-term care and austerity in the UK: a growing crisis CASP checklist for qualitative studies consists of 3 sections containing 10 questions that researchers need to ask when evaluating evidence from qualitative studies (see supplementary . /Filter /FlateDecode &quot;The qualities of an effective mentor&quot; (Gray and Smith, 2000) was critiqued using the Critical Appraisal Skills Programme (CASP, 2006) framework. However, there is a crisis of funding in the NHS, so the issue of district nurse time looks to be a serious barrier for the long term, unless staffing improves. Compare and analyze the main concepts and the framework. TheNursing and Midwifery Council (2018)state nurses should alwayspracticein line with the best available evidence, they must make sure advice or information given is evidence-based and maintain the skills and knowledge which is needed for safe and effective practice. Analysis consisted of computing the frequency of certain attitudes, pain assessment practices or beliefs. There are four basic steps: describing, analyzing, interpreting, and evaluating. << But where visits were /MediaBox [0 0 595 842] Some participants expressed that they had withdrawn from social life A Critique Paper. /CropBox [0.0 0.0 595.0 842.0] patient guidance. The researcher includes some of these comments and statements within the study, this is the researcher trying to provide evidence of credibility according to Holland and Rees (2010). There were thirty-one surveys distributed, only twenty-six were returned, one of the surveys was taken out due to personally identifiable information being included. This tool worked well throughout the research as the semi-structured interviews acted as a guide on the subject, as key questions were predetermined before the interview. 2011 - Wolters Kluwer/Lippincott Williams & Wilkins - Philadelphia. /Pages 2 0 R When compared with different appraisal methods (i.e. 1st ed. Different frameworks can be used to critique research articles, the framework which will be used within this assignment is the Holland and Rees (2010) critiquing research framework. This can be contrasted with wounds that are said to heal by primary intention, or through closing the incision by fixing the edges with stitches (sutures), clips, adhesives or staples (McCaughan, 2018). depression in people who had undergone open wound surgery. << This essay assesses a peer reviewed paper written by McCaughan et al (2018) and critiquing framework - and adds to the body of nursing knowledge. Article A used semi structured interviews which are the most common type of interviews used in qualitative research (Holloway and Wheeler 2010). endobj This framework has been chosen due to its ability to access online and detail of the questions. Copyright 2003 - 2023 - UKEssays is a trading name of Business Bliss Consultants FZE, a company registered in United Arab Emirates. /OpenAction [3 0 R /XYZ null null 0] *You can also browse our support articles here >. (2012), in which there were three common barriers to pain assessment and management in general. /CropBox [0.0 0.0 595.0 842.0] /CropBox [0.0 0.0 595.0 842.0] What is the hierarchy of evidence in research? << benefits of using holland and rees critiquing framework benefits of using holland and rees critiquing framework vo 9 Thng Su, 2022 vo 9 Thng Su, 2022 Both articles represent patients values and expectations as they state throughout each article the importance of an efficient pain assessment, so the patient is pain free. revolution The British Journal of Psychiatry, 206 (4), pp-265. (2005). >> Within article A it is stated maximum variation sampling, member checking, peer questioning and cross-examination were used to ensure the trustworthiness, dependability and credibility of the data respectively. Do you have a 2:1 degree or higher in nursing or healthcare? . In another study, Scalise et al (2016) in a different study reported patients Critiquing is a systematic process for evaluating research studies and the results reported. In a identified as part of this study was a are at risk of implementing research context of increasing involvement of the personal account of a widely published findings that are of poor value and/ expert patient in healthcare and research, service-user expert-by-experience, Louise or quality (Rees, 2010b). /ModDate (D:20171214133808Z) Selected participants for this type of research should have experience of these phenomena by whatever ethical means are possible (Parahoo, 2014). These barriers are nursing workload 50% stated this and patient instability 80% of nurses stated this. Holland and Rees framework for critiquing qualitative research articles. endobj (2004). Nurses within article B also considered the use of pain assessment tools as important, compared to article B where nurses stated they did not see them as important for ICU patients. recommendations, overall strengths and limitations, and the relevance of the study to Search restrictions used consisted of full text, nursing, English language, also the date range used was 2012 to 2019. CASP Randomised Controlled Trial Checklist 2018. experienced a lot of pain and reduction in mobility, lack of appetite, disrupted sleep, >> One difference in findings is that nurses within article A felt the need for pain assessment tools in ICU patients was not necessary, whereas article Bs participants stated their use to be important. These articles were the most recent and linked to the specific choice of topic better than other articles that were found. Evidence-Based Nursing British Medical Journal. this introduction. Use this with a research article so you can identify the key aspects of the study and where you can usually find them. Selected participants for this type of research should have experience of these phenomena by whatever ethical means are possible (Parahoo, 2014). A new framework for critiquing health-related research is presented in this article. The qualitative design which can be found in article A is phenomenology, this focuses on the lived experience of individuals, this design matches the aim. skin problems and side-effects from medication for example dizziness and vomiting. All transcripts were reread throughout the open coding stage and checked several times and keywords, expressions, actualities, incidents, similarities and differences were all noted. /Contents 38 0 R /Contents 42 0 R Qualitative content analysis in nursing research: concepts, procedures and measures to achieve trustworthiness. This essay assesses a peer reviewed paper written by McCaughan et al (2018) and published in the International Journal of Nursing Studies. TheNursing and Midwifery Council (2018)state nurses should alwayspracticein line with the best available evidence, they must make sure advice or information given is evidence-based and maintain the skills and knowledge which is needed for safe and effective practice. /MediaBox [0.0 0.0 595.0 842.0] (2018) Challenges faced by nurses in using pain assessment scale in patients unable to communicate: a qualitative study. There were thirty-one surveys distributed, only twenty-six were returned, one of the surveys was taken out due to personally identifiable information being included. Study for free with our range of university lectures! Article A attempted to ensure the accuracy of the themes by peer checking the transcripts with two faculty members with a PhD in nursing who were not involved within the study. << << /Group << Research design is as a strategy which answers the research question or aim, in qualitative research the design should be aimed at how to obtain the information in the best way for whom it is to be gained from and how long the data collection occur (Polit and Beck, 2018). /XObject << /Contents 40 0 R Table 7.3: Qualitative research articles Polit and Beck (2018) state purposeful sampling can lead to bias, but it can also be a useful approach when the researcher wants a sample of experts. No plagiarism, guaranteed! Why use Holland and Rees critiquing? Critical Analysis of Evidence research papers; qualitative and quantitative, using a framework set out by Holland and Rees (2010), and will explore the impact on practice. This article, the second in a three-part series on research, explores quantitative research. The focus of the study was very clear surgical wound healing by secondary intention and the perception of patients who have had experience with that type of wound. Within article B maintaining the anonymity of the data was considered crucial to encourage participants to answer the questions according to clinical practice. This result was also reported by EBP allows resources to be used efficiently and in a cost effective way. /MediaBox [0.0 0.0 595.0 842.0] The experience of the participants as nurses and as nurses in an intensive care unit ranged from less than two to greater than ten years. /Group 33 0 R May patients reported that many district stitched. The general advantages and disadvantages of the two types of studies will also be presented. Antibiotics and antiseptics for surgical wounds healing by secondary There is no mention within this study of inclusion or exclusion criteria. /Contents 34 0 R This shows easier, quicker pain assessment tools and further training is required for carrying out these assessments. All participants were nurses with experience in the ICU setting, nurses experience ranged from less than two to greater than ten years. intention: A qualitative study International journal of nursing studies, 77 , pp-38. /MediaBox [0.0 0.0 595.0 842.0] The research found in relation to their aim is nurses do not use pain assessment tools as much as they should be within ICU settings. /Type /Catalog /Resources 32 0 R One difference in findings is that nurses within article A felt the need for pain assessment tools in ICU patients was not necessary, whereas article Bs participants stated their use to be important. 4 0 obj The findings from this study show that there are various factors which could affect the use of pain assessment and management in patients unable to communicate. Scalise, A., Calamita, R., Tartaglione, C., Pierangeli, M., Bolletta, E., Gioacchini, M., From using the Holland and Rees (2010) critiquing framework weaknesses for article A there was no mention within their article of limitations, the study was conducted well and answered the research question. /CropBox [0.0 0.0 595.0 842.0] This article analyses the content of frameworks that are commonly used to critique quantitative research and frameworks that are commonly used to critique qualitative research and then presents a single framework that addresses both research approaches. Royal College of Nursing (2009). Nursing: Evidence-Based Practice skills. Rose, L., Smith, O., Glinas, C., Haslam, L., Dale, C., Luk, E. and Watt-Watson, J. << Results Of the 1253 studies screened, 1139 were excluded from abstracts and a further 70 excluded from full text articles. /Parent 2 0 R >> [Accessed 29 April 2019]. The critiquing frameworks enables readers to make a judgement regarding the soundness of the research. Poor Both papers have used the best research they could find when explaining why efficient pain assessment and management is important within the ICU setting. Hollis, C., Morriss, R., Martin, J., Amani, S., Cotton, R., Denis, M. and Lewis, S. All participants were nurses with experience in the ICU setting, nurses experience ranged from less than two to greater than ten years. /Parent 2 0 R stream Looking for a flexible role? Article A was also approved by the Ethics Committee of Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, both papers gained informed consent and mentioned confidentiality within their studies. Graneheim, U. and Lundman, B. 10 0 obj Holland & Rees (2010) argued that focus is a major criterion in judging whether the quantitative method applied is appropriate in the context of the research issue concerned, which is again dependent on identifiable measurable variables and the importance of the topic being studied. Due to the most common barrier being nursing workload, unit policy should support the use of assessment tools that are not only supported by research but are also quick and easy to use. enablers are that there is a wide variety of communication aids that can be used or Enter a Melbet promo code and get a generous bonus, An Insight into Coupons and a Secret Bonus, Organic Hacks to Tweak Audio Recording for Videos Production, Bring Back Life to Your Graphic Images- Used Best Graphic Design Software, New Google Update and Future of Interstitial Ads. . 16 0 obj /Parent 2 0 R How to use Checklist. p. 86) ii) for estimating the standard deviation by using 2, 4, or 8 suitably chosen order statistics; (cf. All results are clearly presented within the articles results section, results are presented using tables. Understanding the research process for evidence-based nursing practice 4. (2012). Ethical considerations within research set out core principles to protect the dignity, safety and rights of the individuals who are taking part, the study should have potential benefit to the individuals themselves or future patients and be of non-maleficence (Holland and Rees, 2010). The writers also expressed a need for psychological interventions. The authors were clear on why they embarked on this study, because surgical wound healing by secondary intention is an under researched area, so there is a lack of scientific evidence on which practice can be based on. But where visits were consistent and well-timed, there were reports of patient satisfaction. Reconstructing the Constructivist Roman Law Thesis' (2010) 54 International . on wound management and the importance of surgical wound healing by secondary /Creator 3 What are the 3 parts of a critique paper? /Rotate 0 Are there frameworks for critiquing quantitative studies? There were 31 surveys given out to intensive care nurses, 26 of them participated in the study. Both papers have used the best research they could find when explaining why efficient pain assessment and management is important within the ICU setting. endobj benefits of using holland and rees critiquing framework. 2018. (2012). Ethical Context of Nursing Research. Referencing and Creative Commons. One quantitative and one qualitative using the holland and ree's critiquing framework. /Kids [5 0 R 6 0 R 7 0 R 8 0 R 9 0 R 10 0 R 11 0 R 12 0 R 13 0 R 14 0 R A disadvantage of carrying out a survey is the breadth rather than the depth of the information is emphasized. Within quantitative research there are different critiquing frameworks for the different methods used.

Deployment Schedule 2022, Articles B